3 ms·
Which robots? We can barely manage to keep rovers alive on Mars and they aren't lifting 500lbs space rocks. The Chinese couldn't keep their rover losing its dri
by drzaiusapelord 10y ago
Which robots? We can barely manage to keep rovers alive on Mars and they aren't lifting 500lbs space rocks. The Chinese couldn't keep their rover losing its drive train on the moon after 48 hours. The ESA has never had a moon rover.
We're very, very far from industrious robots on Earth, let alone on the moon or mars. We aren't even building mega-structures with robots here outside of trivial edge cases, why do you think we can do it on the moon?
Also from a cost per lbs perspective, swarms of giant building robots will cost more than the GDP of most nation states. A handful of astronauts with powertools working with ultra-light materials won't. For example, a small team can raise up Bigelow's mostly inflatable moon base concept in days:
http://spaceindustrynews.com/nasa-and-bigelow-aerospace-make-plans-for-moon-base/ http://spaceindustrynews.com/nasa-and-bigelow-aerospace-make...
No 50,000 lbs space mechs required.
- jlebrech 10y agorobots that can 3d print regolith into bricks, and ones that can pick and place.
- drzaiusapelord 10y agoI think you're greatly underestimating what it takes to mine regolith in vast quantities, transport it, produce it into something usable, then build heavy structures with automation. You're looking at 10,000+ lbs machines and many of them and with no heavy energy source. You're not running these off solar or a small RTG, so you're probably talking building a nuclear reactor on the moon just to power these juggernauts. Meanwhile human built lightweight structures are pretty much doable right now with a heavy human rated rocket like the upcoming SLS or SpaceX's upcoming heavy configuration.
- jlebrech 10y agoI'm pretty sure there's lots of dust that can be sintered too.