3 ms·
Evidently all Chrome apps are being phased out for Windows/Linux/Mac, so I can only assume they will. Not that Signal is a very feature-filled app or concept (i
by rfz 9y ago
Evidently all Chrome apps are being phased out for Windows/Linux/Mac, so I can only assume they will. Not that Signal is a very feature-filled app or concept (it doesn't need to be), but it could definitely stand to be a bit more polished.
http://www.omgchrome.com/not-joke-google-killing-chrome-apps/ http://www.omgchrome.com/not-joke-google-killing-chrome-apps...
- Insanity 9y agoAh yeah, I completely forgot about this.
- r3bl 9y agoAh, I didn't even know that this was happening. Thanks for sharing!
- lima 9y agoI hate this. Chrome Apps are nicely sandboxed within Chrome's sandbox. Now everyone is porting their stuff Electron, which has no sandbox. Deprecating Chrome Apps is hurting users by making their systems less secure.
- angry_octet 9y agoI am contemplating extracting the bits of chromium required to just make it an app container, so I can continue to run Chrome apps on the desktop. Since Chrome apps will still exist for Chromebooks it should keep working.
- lima 9y agoI fear that app developers would abandon their Chrome apps in favor of Electron.
- rfz 9y agoSeems to me that devs would only be smart (read: not in our favor or best interest) to go where the people are; what's the ChromeOS userbase compared to that of other OSes?
- angry_octet 9y agoI don't care about ChromeOS, it's cross-platform, offline capable, secure and sandboxed applications I want. How much easier to distribute just the Chrome App engine to hundreds of varying Windows boxes, than the individual apps?
- rfz 9y agoI was agreeing with you.
- angry_octet 9y agoElectron misses some core native application type features because they are not available to it. I can't see them coming to HTML5 either. It is just a colossal stuff up all round.