"Ok so you are saying that the new solution isn't any worse in terms of security than the current one, so it's fine?" Yes. You're blowing up the security argum

"Ok so you are saying that the new solution isn't any worse in terms of security than the current one, so it's fine?" Yes. You're blowing up the security argument when really it isn't the security of it that is the problem -- our current infrastructure isn't more secure, and we have had only minimal problems with it thus far. The problem is the imminent and looming destruction of various thousands of ecosystems, and the continuing habitability of the planet. It could be done. We got to the moon in about twenty years, which was much more of a technological leap than this will be. With the concentrated effort and enough propaganda, we could make the switch from coal/gas/oil. We are very rapidly running out of runway.