3 ms·
Think less literal please. High-end stuff is still junk on an absolute scale. The marketcap and "I want it all"-scale don't make businesses interesting. What'
by untilHellbanned 9y ago
Think less literal please. High-end stuff is still junk on an absolute scale.
The marketcap and "I want it all"-scale don't make businesses interesting. What's interesting are things that can't be quantified well and therefore can't be competed on by hard work and assholery.
- coldtea 9y ago>Think less literal please. High-end stuff is still junk on an absolute scale. If you think "less literal" everything is "junk" compared to personal health and/or love. >The marketcap and "I want it all"-scale don't make businesses interesting. What's interesting are things that can't be quantified well and therefore can't be competed on by hard work and assholery. For your own definition of "interesting". But Amazon, FP, Apple (and tons of other subjects) are still interesting if we use the common, agreed upon, dictionary, traditional definition of the term interesting: "arousing curiosity or interest; holding or catching the attention.". And there's few things about Apple, FB, and Amazon's success stories that can be "quantified well", as their story and success goes beyond their financial status. How about why and how they succeeded?