> The chances of return are higher than 0%. They are just causally disconnected. You're leaving off an important clause that I had: > 0% chance of personal, d

> The chances of return are higher than 0%. They are just causally disconnected. You're leaving off an important clause that I had: > 0% chance of personal, direct, return on your investment. Which is the most important part. I agree that essentially dumping money at the problem will help, but I disagree that it should be considered an investment in the traditional sense. I'm not sure what to call it other than charity.