> Nuclear now looks like a technology where every decade or two you lose a city. No, it's a technology where if you use power plants decades out of date, that

> Nuclear now looks like a technology where every decade or two you lose a city. No, it's a technology where if you use power plants decades out of date, that have known safety issues, and then cover-up the magnitude of the problem once a catastrope occurs then you have a very expensive clean-up operation. Cleaning up Fukushima will be expensive, there's no denying it, but it's arguably the case that the Deepwater Horizon rig mess could cost significantly more.