4 ms·
Back when I decided, backblaze didn't work nicely with headless linux. If that changed I might consider changing. Currently I only use it to back-up the non-hu
by rocqua 10y ago
Back when I decided, backblaze didn't work nicely with headless linux. If that changed I might consider changing.
Currently I only use it to back-up the non-huge parts of my home directory and /etc. This keeps costs reasonable to me.
I know these prices are pretty close to the actual cost of storage, which is amazon S3. I suppose backblaze can do better by handling their own storage.
- cookiecaper 10y agoThere are lots of options to store to most cloud backends nowadays. Check out rclone and duplicity.