4 ms·
If coal is so great and cheap, then why is no one building new coal plants? Over the past few years wind and solar account for ~40% of new generation capacity
by jartelt 9y ago
If coal is so great and cheap, then why is no one building new coal plants? Over the past few years wind and solar account for ~40% of new generation capacity and natural gas makes up the rest. Based on your comment, one would expect to either see only natural gas capacity being built out or some mix of natural gas and coal. That is not what is happening and it's because wind and solar are cheaper than coal in several areas of the country.
- dangerlibrary 9y agoI feel like you and I don't disagree, but for some reason you think we do. Natural gas is replacing coal for base load generation because it is cheaper. from wind-watch.org: > "How does wind power affect base load? Wind power has no effect on base load. https://www.wind-watch.org/faq-electricity.php https://www.wind-watch.org/faq-electricity.php
- jartelt 9y agoWell, you said wind and solar are more expensive than coal and I am saying they are not (hence why they are being built out like crazy). You seem to be arguing that wind and solar cannot replace coal since there are intermittent. I think that is wrong.
- dangerlibrary 9y agoOkay, cool. When power generation companies demonstrate that you are correct and replace their base load production capacity with solar and wind I will (joyfully) eat crow. That isn't really happening right now, though. Natural gas is replacing coal and non-hydro renewables make up a very small fraction of overall capacity. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_1_02_a https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cf...
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]