3 ms·
"you will have to decide between using Flash with a 99.6% market penetration or HTML5 with roughly less then 40% of users browsers" Adobe keep rolling out the
by bl4k 16y ago
"you will have to decide between using Flash with a 99.6% market penetration or HTML5 with roughly less then 40% of users browsers"
Adobe keep rolling out the '99 percent' argument, and it is false. This argument is essentially 'hey look, everybody is already running our proprietary virtual machine so there is no need for a standards based solution!'. If we all thought like that, there would never be any progress.
HTML5 is not a flash replacement, but HTML5 + CSS3 + Canvas + Javascript + SVG + new DOM etc. sure is
When most articles refer to HTML5, they are often refering to the combination of new technologies, rather than the markup standard itself (ie. what was initially 'Web Applications 1.0' from WHATWG).
- melling 16y agoI think it is usually understood that when people say html5, they are discussing the set of technologies that you mentioned, at least among developers. Unless another buzzword arises, the term html5 is going to stick. When the nyt or wsj write an html5 article, for example, do they really need to explain the details to their readers?