> Viewed in links, lynx or eww, the old version is a Pareto improvement over the new Again, if you're qualifying the statement, it's not pareto. On transparenc

> Viewed in links, lynx or eww, the old version is a Pareto improvement over the new Again, if you're qualifying the statement, it's not pareto. On transparency, water is a pareto improvement over Coca Cola. On growability, wood is a pareto improvement over steel. The old version was an improvement over the new one; the new version is worse. They're not "pareto" or "strict" though, and I'm interested to see what the next steps are, building on this new foundation.