I find his anecdotes interesting, because I treat them as such. I think the conclusion and original thought that Gladwell wraps around these anecdotes and stori

I find his anecdotes interesting, because I treat them as such. I think the conclusion and original thought that Gladwell wraps around these anecdotes and stories is often off-base or outright wrong. If you are not familiar with it, here is the original critical review of Gladwell from the NYTimes that caused an ongoing stir (Gladwell responded on his blog): http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/books/review/Pinker-t.html?_r=1&ref=books&pagewanted=print http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/books/review/Pinker-t.html...