3 ms·
Everything you write about a DHT is true, but … that's not what Ward's Wiki is doing. It sounds like what it's doing is a very, very good fit for what the IWC
by zeveb 10y ago
Everything you write about a DHT is true, but … that's not what Ward's Wiki is doing.
It sounds like what it's doing is a very, very good fit for what the IWC guys are up to — and it could all be done without JavaScript!
> "Strictly worse" means that it is not better in any way; that the old version is a pareto improvement over the new one.
Viewed in links, lynx or eww, the old version is a Pareto improvement over the new, because the new version is nothing but a blank page, while the old version was full of information.
- chriswarbo 10y ago> Viewed in links, lynx or eww, the old version is a Pareto improvement over the new Again, if you're qualifying the statement, it's not pareto. On transparency, water is a pareto improvement over Coca Cola. On growability, wood is a pareto improvement over steel. The old version was an improvement over the new one; the new version is worse. They're not "pareto" or "strict" though, and I'm interested to see what the next steps are, building on this new foundation.