I agree, Go in the title is irrelevant. Otherwise, it is a decent overview of the notion of pointer, although there are many of such overviews around. My other

I agree, Go in the title is irrelevant. Otherwise, it is a decent overview of the notion of pointer, although there are many of such overviews around. My other objection is with using code like * b++ in a text that aims to be crystal clear about a single concept (pointers). That can bring totally irrelevant questions on operator precedence and right / left associations. It would be better to say * b = 201. My 2c.