3 ms·
Yes, that could be more specific (and I will make it probably configurable), currently it is: <a href>, <body>, <br>, <div>, <h1>, <h2>, <h3>, <h4>, <h5>,
by seky 9y ago
Yes, that could be more specific (and I will make it probably configurable), currently it is:
<a href>,
<body>,
<br>,
<div>,
<h1>,
<h2>,
<h3>,
<h4>,
<h5>,
<h6>,
<head>,
<hr>,
<html>,
<i>,
<img src width height>,
<li>,
<ol>,
<p>,
<ruby>,
<strong>,
<table>,
<tbody>,
<td colspan rowspan>,
<th colspan rowspan>,
<title>,
<tr>
- oneeyedpigeon 9y agoIt also converts e.g. b to strong.
- mercer 9y agoThat doesn't sound right. By all means correct me if I'm wrong, but I recall learning that there's a semantic difference between b/strong (as well as i/em).
- Mtinie 9y agoThis probably isn't the same source that your'e thinking of, but here's a well-considered answer on SO to the question "Why are the <b> and <i> tags deprecated?". https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/a/255588 https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/a/255588
- mercer 9y agoThanks!