2 ms·
It examined the extent to which the rear end crashes negated the economic advantages, and found that they did not fully negate the economic advantages. They ins
by obstinate 9y ago
It examined the extent to which the rear end crashes negated the economic advantages, and found that they did not fully negate the economic advantages. They instead had an economic advantage of ~40-50k USD per site per year. See pages 5, 68, 74. This is why it's important to go further into papers than just reading the abstract.
- Retric 9y agoI say they increase accidents you say, that's not true they lower costs. I say that does not mean they lower accidents. You respond yes they do, they lower cost. Do you really want me to say that's not my argument using different words? If your point is sure they cause more accidents but that's ok because X then use that argument don't pretend there are zero costs. PS: Economic arguments are very easy to manipulate based on what you do and do not count. So, yes I also disagree with the study, but that's not the argument I am making.