12 ms·

The way to go are automated radars, that are clearly visible. They recently installed a new radar at a local highway, right at the beginning of a speed limit.

The way to go are automated radars, that are clearly visible. They recently installed a new radar at a local highway, right at the beginning of a speed limit. Everyone sticks to the speed limit now. A different section of the highway has "section control". (Cameras at the beginning and end of a section that record license plates and determine average speed). Nobody speeds there either. With todays technology it is trivial to enforce speed limits everywhere, and people really do stick to the speed limit if they know that there are consequences.

terryf 10y ago
So you like the fact that the police know exactly where and when you drove? Because the licence plate tracking cameras require that, you know. Also, the notion that there is some universal speed limit that makes driving safe on a particular road is silly. Two scenarios with speed limit of x: 1) sunny day, brand new porsche, new tyres. I'm driving at a sped of x+5 2) windy, snowy day, nissan sunny from the 80s with almost worn out tyres. I'm driving at x-5 Pick the safer one. I doubt anyone would think option 2 is safer, yet 1 is illegal and 2 is perfectly fine.
- nicky0 10y ago
  I see. Your'e saying: since speed limits aren't perfect in all cases, so lets not have them at all.
  - terryf 10y ago
    I do believe in increasing personal responsibility of people and having less of a nanny state, so I do tend towards that answer, but it's really not that black and white. On highways and places where pedestrians and bicyclists are not allowed - yes, no speed limit makes a lot of sense (and is available in Germany for example) In cities and suburbs where kids can run into the street in unexpected places - more thought is needed what is the best solution. I've actually gotten a speeding ticket because I was going 35km/h in a "construction" zone with a temporary 30km/h limit on a freaking Sunday with nobody around. That is also clearly ridiculous.
u801e 10y ago
> They recently installed a new radar at a local highway, right at the beginning of a speed limit. > Everyone sticks to the speed limit now. Has this also resulted in traffic bunching up? That is, long lines of vehicles tailgating each other?

terryf 10y ago

So you like the fact that the police know exactly where and when you drove? Because the licence plate tracking cameras require that, you know. Also, the notion that there is some universal speed limit that makes driving safe on a particular road is silly. Two scenarios with speed limit of x: 1) sunny day, brand new porsche, new tyres. I'm driving at a sped of x+5 2) windy, snowy day, nissan sunny from the 80s with almost worn out tyres. I'm driving at x-5 Pick the safer one. I doubt anyone would think option 2 is safer, yet 1 is illegal and 2 is perfectly fine.

nicky0 10y ago
I see. Your'e saying: since speed limits aren't perfect in all cases, so lets not have them at all.
- terryf 10y ago
  I do believe in increasing personal responsibility of people and having less of a nanny state, so I do tend towards that answer, but it's really not that black and white. On highways and places where pedestrians and bicyclists are not allowed - yes, no speed limit makes a lot of sense (and is available in Germany for example) In cities and suburbs where kids can run into the street in unexpected places - more thought is needed what is the best solution. I've actually gotten a speeding ticket because I was going 35km/h in a "construction" zone with a temporary 30km/h limit on a freaking Sunday with nobody around. That is also clearly ridiculous.

u801e 10y ago

> They recently installed a new radar at a local highway, right at the beginning of a speed limit. > Everyone sticks to the speed limit now. Has this also resulted in traffic bunching up? That is, long lines of vehicles tailgating each other?