> but certainly enough preponderance of indication What does that mean exactly? The only people who are giving the "evidence" or "indication" are the people w

> but certainly enough preponderance of indication What does that mean exactly? The only people who are giving the "evidence" or "indication" are the people who stand to profit the most. Once you get something that says that Uber is either racist or promotes work practices that lead to suicide, by un-unbiased external party, that's interesting. It's surprising how otherwise intelligent seeming people can get taken in by not understanding inherent conflicts of interests in cases like this.