Very much so -- I had only read the first part of the article when I wrote this reply, having read the whole thing now (and the linked pizza paper) I'm more tha

Very much so -- I had only read the first part of the article when I wrote this reply, having read the whole thing now (and the linked pizza paper) I'm more than a little horrified at what can, in the most optimistic case, be described as extreme carelessness. I have a pre-existing bias against papers relating to nutrition science, and this looks worse even than I expect. I would love to see a treatment that looks at especially noteworthy research in the area that passes a rigorous methodological review, much less has been replicated with any reliability.