4 ms·
That, and also probably because otherwise CEOs would take ZERO risks. Not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing.
by mcbruiser3 9y ago
That, and also probably because otherwise CEOs would take ZERO risks. Not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing.
- coldtea 9y agoIf a CEO doesn't have any negative sequences from their decisions, then any "risky" decisions they take for the company are not actual risks for them either.
- evilduck 9y agoIn the cases where the golden parachutes are absurdly large, I don't really see how they're really incentivized to take risks either. Perform or don't perform, the difference is the CEO's yacht size, or how many mansions they own around the globe?