4 ms·

i assume they want to have only one "place of truth" which should be code. The designers can generate the skethfile of components and then use them in their lay

i assume they want to have only one "place of truth" which should be code. The designers can generate the skethfile of components and then use them in their layouts (eg usecase core components) also it opens up things like "using real (suboptimal) data" or cross-project-wide refactoring of design, etc

jordanlev 9y ago
Ah, this makes sense (assuming this is what they're saying). So there would be one sketch file for the basic components that is generated from the React code, but the designers who design specific pages of the site (for example) would still design in sketch, but pull from the components of the one "read-only" (react-generated) sketch files. Very cool!
- jongold 9y ago
  Exactly (and thanks to Andreas for explaining it better than me). We have a design systems team that creates & maintains the system (in collaboration with our product designers), resulting in read-only Sketch templates. when _designing with_ canonical components our product designers are using that template, so it's kind of the same workflow - we're just creating the read-only templates from code rather than by hand.
  - bstasse 9y ago
    So your design systems team has to be able to code React components, or any change or new component has to be coded by a developer before being made available to your product designers? If so, does is not lengthen and complicate a lot your design process?
  - bostonvaulter2 9y ago
    Would be fantastic to add a section to the blog post and project README with a quote like this > the designers who design specific pages of the site (for example) would still design in sketch, but pull from the components of the one "read-only" (react-generated) sketch file Maybe under a "why use this?" heading?