5 ms·

So what is Ovh's reputation as a host? Anyone use them? Any problems? The prices are amazingly cheap, so might be worth trying them just because it won't cost

So what is Ovh's reputation as a host? Anyone use them? Any problems? The prices are amazingly cheap, so might be worth trying them just because it won't cost much.

gregorym 16y ago
They're french. They are very popular here.
- ErrantX 16y ago
  Gandi.net are another French host I recommend. For small servers they are pretty comparable price wise (more RAM, less CPU) but I prefer their interface :)
  - loup-vaillant 16y ago
    Plus, they let you send mail. As far as I know, all ports are open. EDIT: Why the down-vote? Is my comment wrong? Is it out of topic? I can understand the random up-votes, but I thought the down ones should be justified.
    - _Lemon_ 16y ago
      There's a comment beneath you that quotes the page (near the bottom) "you can not send emails (you can receive them)." Although I agree with you, a comment explaining would have been better than a down-vote -- best not to take those personally!
      - loup-vaillant 16y ago
        Total misunderstanding. The comment below (to which I was implicitly refering to), talks about Kimsufi. I checked before I talked. This comment speaks true. I knew it. Now, my comment was replying to a comment of ErrantX, which were talking about GANDI. So was I. I thought there was absolutely no ambiguity, but now, I'm not so sure: namely, which interface ErrantX actually prefers? His "but" puzzles me.
        ErrantX 16y ago
        Yeh, sorry. I meant Gandi :) love their interface.
ned 16y ago
I've had dedicated servers, shared hosts and individual domains with them for a few years. I had a hardware failure on a server once, the HD died, they replaced it in a few hours, it was handled pretty efficiently. The price is really low. The connectivity in Europe is good (although my customers are mostly based in France, so I don't have real benchmarks from elsewhere). Two caveats: - They have no taste and are really bad a interface design. Their administration tools are notoriously confusing, even after years of using them I'm still blown away at how they manage to make something simple so complicated. The boss (Octave) will post product announcements in the forums, and not in the official newsletter, encouraging a cult following of enthusiats/amateurs (that can be seen as both good or bad I guess…). Don't expect good documentation either. - support is sub-par. I only contacted them a couple of times, and my carefully worded questions were met by a standardized reply, as if they had only read half of my email. tl;dr : if you're a good sysadmin and don't need any hand-holding, they are good.
madflo 16y ago
I've been using the MiniCloud service for a few weeks during the beta (the service was then offered) and for a few days as a paying customer. Well... everything is working pretty smoothly. I'm using their manager to upgrade/downgrade my host's RAM on a daily basis, as I'm using the cloud as a pre-production server for a webapp. The manager UI is quite ugly, to say the least, but sufficient to start/stop and upgrade/downgrade the virtual host. I did not had to ask for help from the support team so I cannot offer any advice on them.
- dtf 16y ago
  I don't quite understand that page. What does 8GHz mean? Would these nodes be suitable for compute-intensive work (eg ray-tracing)?
  - madflo 16y ago
    That's 4 cores running at 2Ghz each. I agree that the 8Ghz notation is quite confusing.
_Lemon_ 16y ago
I feel I could write an essay on the pros and cons of OVH but it basically comes down to bandwidth quality. You're only really paying for the cost of the hardware, the rest is a heavy reliance on peering with no or little transit links (you'll see they only sell to some EU countries).
- Loic 16y ago
  I don't know what kind of bandwidth you really need, but I am running a couple of services on dedicated servers with them and all my customers are very happy with them. In fact US East coast customers often find my services faster than equivalent hosted in California. On the forums the only person complaining where people doing NSFW hosting or radio streams. For web app stuff (including Git/Subversion hosting) it is really really good. You can check the backbone here: http://weathermap.ovh.net/ http://weathermap.ovh.net/ Also, for people not aware, they have their own servers with liquid cooling and they are crazy with respect to optimization of their processes, think TPM and Toyota.
  - _Lemon_ 16y ago
    I have 307 servers from the smallest to the largest and thousands of customers all round the world so I see the bandwidth problems first hand. There have been a couple of occasions when there network just hasn't been available to parts of America (measured in number of complaints I have to deal with). The concern is, just because it works for you, doesn't mean it will work for all of your customers. Especially if they're not in the EU. I'm not so sure on the cooling either -- their hard disks are very hot (I admit I don't know enough about hardware to say whether this is a problem) but generally I don't see many hardware failures. I do however see plenty of random reboots -- only the HG servers (and strangely a few 19.99 servers with over a year uptime) seem to survive these as you'd expect.
    - Loic 16y ago
      Just wondering, you seams unhappy but at the same time you stay with them, is there a reason? I am adding new servers to my infrastructure with them on a regular basis and may end up having that many too. The question is serious, when you do your analysis between cost/quality/service, why is it still good for 300+ servers and why are you not going the collocation way?
kierank 16y ago
OVH are famous for cheap bittorrent seedboxes.

So what is Ovh's reputation as a host? Anyone use them? Any problems? The prices are amazingly cheap, so might be worth trying them just because it won't cost much.

gregorym 16y ago

They're french. They are very popular here.

ErrantX 16y ago
Gandi.net are another French host I recommend. For small servers they are pretty comparable price wise (more RAM, less CPU) but I prefer their interface :)
- loup-vaillant 16y ago
  Plus, they let you send mail. As far as I know, all ports are open. EDIT: Why the down-vote? Is my comment wrong? Is it out of topic? I can understand the random up-votes, but I thought the down ones should be justified.
  - _Lemon_ 16y ago
    There's a comment beneath you that quotes the page (near the bottom) "you can not send emails (you can receive them)." Although I agree with you, a comment explaining would have been better than a down-vote -- best not to take those personally!
    - loup-vaillant 16y ago
      Total misunderstanding. The comment below (to which I was implicitly refering to), talks about Kimsufi. I checked before I talked. This comment speaks true. I knew it. Now, my comment was replying to a comment of ErrantX, which were talking about GANDI. So was I. I thought there was absolutely no ambiguity, but now, I'm not so sure: namely, which interface ErrantX actually prefers? His "but" puzzles me.
      - ErrantX 16y ago
        Yeh, sorry. I meant Gandi :) love their interface.

ned 16y ago

I've had dedicated servers, shared hosts and individual domains with them for a few years. I had a hardware failure on a server once, the HD died, they replaced it in a few hours, it was handled pretty efficiently. The price is really low. The connectivity in Europe is good (although my customers are mostly based in France, so I don't have real benchmarks from elsewhere). Two caveats: - They have no taste and are really bad a interface design. Their administration tools are notoriously confusing, even after years of using them I'm still blown away at how they manage to make something simple so complicated. The boss (Octave) will post product announcements in the forums, and not in the official newsletter, encouraging a cult following of enthusiats/amateurs (that can be seen as both good or bad I guess…). Don't expect good documentation either. - support is sub-par. I only contacted them a couple of times, and my carefully worded questions were met by a standardized reply, as if they had only read half of my email. tl;dr : if you're a good sysadmin and don't need any hand-holding, they are good.

madflo 16y ago

I've been using the MiniCloud service for a few weeks during the beta (the service was then offered) and for a few days as a paying customer. Well... everything is working pretty smoothly. I'm using their manager to upgrade/downgrade my host's RAM on a daily basis, as I'm using the cloud as a pre-production server for a webapp. The manager UI is quite ugly, to say the least, but sufficient to start/stop and upgrade/downgrade the virtual host. I did not had to ask for help from the support team so I cannot offer any advice on them.

dtf 16y ago
I don't quite understand that page. What does 8GHz mean? Would these nodes be suitable for compute-intensive work (eg ray-tracing)?
- madflo 16y ago
  That's 4 cores running at 2Ghz each. I agree that the 8Ghz notation is quite confusing.

_Lemon_ 16y ago

I feel I could write an essay on the pros and cons of OVH but it basically comes down to bandwidth quality. You're only really paying for the cost of the hardware, the rest is a heavy reliance on peering with no or little transit links (you'll see they only sell to some EU countries).

Loic 16y ago
I don't know what kind of bandwidth you really need, but I am running a couple of services on dedicated servers with them and all my customers are very happy with them. In fact US East coast customers often find my services faster than equivalent hosted in California. On the forums the only person complaining where people doing NSFW hosting or radio streams. For web app stuff (including Git/Subversion hosting) it is really really good. You can check the backbone here: http://weathermap.ovh.net/ http://weathermap.ovh.net/ Also, for people not aware, they have their own servers with liquid cooling and they are crazy with respect to optimization of their processes, think TPM and Toyota.
- _Lemon_ 16y ago
  I have 307 servers from the smallest to the largest and thousands of customers all round the world so I see the bandwidth problems first hand. There have been a couple of occasions when there network just hasn't been available to parts of America (measured in number of complaints I have to deal with). The concern is, just because it works for you, doesn't mean it will work for all of your customers. Especially if they're not in the EU. I'm not so sure on the cooling either -- their hard disks are very hot (I admit I don't know enough about hardware to say whether this is a problem) but generally I don't see many hardware failures. I do however see plenty of random reboots -- only the HG servers (and strangely a few 19.99 servers with over a year uptime) seem to survive these as you'd expect.
  - Loic 16y ago
    Just wondering, you seams unhappy but at the same time you stay with them, is there a reason? I am adding new servers to my infrastructure with them on a regular basis and may end up having that many too. The question is serious, when you do your analysis between cost/quality/service, why is it still good for 300+ servers and why are you not going the collocation way?

kierank 16y ago

OVH are famous for cheap bittorrent seedboxes.