>At the end of the day though, whichever way the law sides, the drone operator has civil restitution available (if it can be proved who shot), which should help

>At the end of the day though, whichever way the law sides, the drone operator has civil restitution available (if it can be proved who shot), which should help shape the court cases. Seems to me that the drone operator has already admitted to wrecking his drone into someone's bullet. He better prepare himself to pay up some $0.25 to replace the bullet and maybe a few million for pain, suffering, and emotional trauma.