3 ms·
I'm not sure why FB doesn't just disable Live for a while. That seems like the obviously ethical thing to do. From a purely selfish point of view, is there som
by JabavuAdams 10y ago
I'm not sure why FB doesn't just disable Live for a while. That seems like the obviously ethical thing to do.
From a purely selfish point of view, is there some legal repercussion to disabling it? I.e. will this mean that FB could be liable for other objectionable content, and can't claim that it's the posting user's fault?
- roystonvassey 10y agoI think I might have not understood your 2nd para altogether but the only legal repercussion I can think of would be the tie-ups that FB has with advertisers who've paid for certain minutes of FB ads. But, this is just financial and one that shouldn't figure when there's such disturbing behaviour at stake.