3 ms·
I'm fascinated by people who think emoji could someday be a more universal way of communication given all of its inherent ambiguity. There are many people who
by dec0dedab0de 10y ago
I'm fascinated by people who think emoji could someday be a more universal way of communication given all of its inherent ambiguity.
There are many people who do not have enough command of their own native language to avoid ambiguity. Sometimes I find this very frustrating, but for the most part they seem happy to misunderstand and be misunderstood, so I try my best to let it go and move on.
- friendzis 10y agoThere are also people with enough command of their own native language to introduce ambiguities on purpose, which I sometimes find fascinating.
- danso 10y agoI do this with punctuation. I tell my students that by default, I'll use exclamation marks when empty boilerplate phrases regardless of my actual enthusiasm, e.g. "Sounds good!". For students whom I am more familiar with and don't need the fakery, I'll settle for "Sounds good.". But depending on how petty and irritable I am at the moment, maybe the closing period will be used as a passive-aggressive way of implying, "No, that does not really 'sound good'.", and you'll just have to guess! After awhile, students appreciate the way programming language interpreters immediately and decisively raise errors on even the simplest typos and syntax errors.
- dec0dedab0de 10y agoIndeed, but I find that I am happier when I assume everyone is being honest. When in doubt I just ask pedantic questions. Dishonest people usually have tells when you take them off script, even though they rarely admit it.