5 ms·
I just got a bar graph full of $0.00 (http://imgur.com/uciLhOG http://imgur.com/uciLhOG). Maybe there's a bug in measuring images and fonts referenced by CSS? M
by solox3 9y ago
I just got a bar graph full of $0.00 (http://imgur.com/uciLhOG http://imgur.com/uciLhOG). Maybe there's a bug in measuring images and fonts referenced by CSS? More decimal places are a good idea.
- laurent123456 9y agoIt seems to work fine at the moment: https://i.imgur.com/WSCMaxC.png https://i.imgur.com/WSCMaxC.png
- 50CNT 9y agoLooks like your site just costs less than a cent everywhere. Rejoice!
- bArray 9y agoI got the same result, but my site weighs 0.01MB apparently (it's actually lower at 6kB according to webpagetest.org). I think small sized sites weigh next to nothing. This is more intended for people with much bigger sites.
- tkadlec 9y agoYeah, it's a rounding thing. I'm guessing your site is so lightweight that the cost ends up being negligible. You should be able to click through from the result page to a fully detailed report from webpagetest.org.