3 ms·
> Instead the article doesn't even mention them in passing. There's something implied there. For me, it's not mentioned simply because that's not the topic of
by laurent123456 10y ago
> Instead the article doesn't even mention them in passing.
There's something implied there. For me, it's not mentioned simply because that's not the topic of the article. But what he seems to imply is that it was purposely omitted from the article - thus conspiracy/manipulation.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoThat's only a conjecture. It's easy to read something into what someone else wrote. I interpreted it only as a complain that a vital piece of information isn't even mentioned, and more as an implication of quality issue than conspiracy.