> Poor form? You could squeeze the bag and get almost an identical amount of juice. They should provide some sort of actual value to their customer. I can sque

> Poor form? You could squeeze the bag and get almost an identical amount of juice. They should provide some sort of actual value to their customer. I can squeeze a honeydew by hand and get plenty of juice. Pomegranate not so much. Kale, not at all. Celery? Maybe a little, but a few drips compared to what a juice press would give me is not at all in the same ball park. Do any of the juice packs contain hard to squeeze fruits or vegetables? The exercise is left to the reader, who can't do their own research without a $750 spend. Poor form. > Was the NYT article on Uber and Unroll.me poor form? I don't know which Uber article that you are referring to, but Uber is in the midst of a sea of bad press and is plenty flush to buy the help of a quality PR firm to see them through it. Unroll.me - if you go after them, you should talk about how Mozilla uses data along with chrome, facebook, the television networks, netflix, etc. It's lazy to villify a single firm when there's an industry full of questionable practices. > Why don't we just require that businesses provide some sort of actual value? If they're producing value, they can prove it, and the product will succeed or fail on the market Not every product produces value. In the world of IT, software in general, and most certainly "cloud services", value should absolutely be questioned more. But it's certainly hard to be a consumer watchdog while at the same time doing the same thing. Especially when your biggest source of revenue is a series of other companies doing the same thing. > But being able to get the same amount of juice by squeezing the bag isn't some "fake news" drive for clicks. Are you sure about that? The video looks to me like it was created with the intent of going viral.