I'm not saying that you're wrong in believing that the cause was likely due to power failure. My point was that you didn't actually know that for a fact (and ha

I'm not saying that you're wrong in believing that the cause was likely due to power failure. My point was that you didn't actually know that for a fact (and hadn't even made an argument for it being power failure, you simply assumed it without explanation). You're accusing me of moving the goalposts simply because I challenged an assumption you made.