The charitable reading is that it's not democratic because processors, not people "vote". The point of a 51% attack is that one person (more or less) controls

The charitable reading is that it's not democratic because processors, not people "vote". The point of a 51% attack is that one person (more or less) controls 51% of the "vote". I mean, we joke about how corrupt American politics are, but it's not like the Kochs or George Soros or whoever can actually control 51% of the vote directly.