I like the thread here, but I'd like to point out that we shouldn't limit our check on ageism to the people who are "still coding". If we want people in dead-e

I like the thread here, but I'd like to point out that we shouldn't limit our check on ageism to the people who are "still coding". If we want people in dead-end jobs and failing industries to have a chance to move forward in new ways, we need to willing to accept qualified "junior" engineers of all ages and backgrounds. I have seen this sort of ageism in the interview process and it's tricky to constructively correct people in having different standards for 22 year-olds than they have for 32, 42, or 52 year-olds.