> The new outlet is erring on the side of caution here because if the case where a suspect is tried as a minor, gets their record sealed at 18, and will be liab

> The new outlet is erring on the side of caution here because if the case where a suspect is tried as a minor, gets their record sealed at 18, and will be liable for slandering the adult's name with a crime he or she committed as a juvenile. Wait, what? Are you saying that the Right to Be Forgotten already exists in the U.S. with respect to criminal convictions of minors?