4 ms·
no.. but I could be a non IT user using hipchat. This sentence is likely meaningless to me.
by jordache 10y ago
no.. but I could be a non IT user using hipchat. This sentence is likely meaningless to me.
- balls187 10y agoSure. I get your point. Just asking if YOU specifically needed the explanation, which I'm sure a number of folks would be happy to provide.
- plange 10y agoThen you would be fine with the standard boilerplate "your data is secure with us"? I'm happy they say this.. now i'd like some sort of proof :-)
- jordache 10y agoA follow up sentence that re-iterates the same sentiment in non technical term will accommodate none technical recipients. Poor UX is my point of this
- bjoernw 10y agoGoogling bcrypt should do the trick and most people know how to do that. </sarcasm>
- jordache 10y agoyou're joking I assume. If not, don't be in the UX field
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- detaro 10y agoIs that a problem? I guess they could have put a "technical details:" in front of it, to make that clearer, but it has to be in that e-mail (otherwise the techies complain) and isn't really something they can explain in a useful way there.
- ams6110 10y agoBetter would be "We securely[1] store your passwords" blah blah...We take your privacy very seriously...blah blah... [1] Technically, we use bcrypt with a random salt.
- balls187 10y agoAn argument could be made to take this a step further and not even go into buzzword details at all, and leave it with boilerplate words. Security is hard. Describing security is even harder. I'm for transparency in security for review, but you can achieve the same via a 3rd party audit. Just my 2c.