3 ms·

>No. That doesn't even make sense. WebM is a video format, it competes with h.264/h.265. Yes, it makes plenty of sense. If WebM were available on iOS, this new

>No. That doesn't even make sense. WebM is a video format, it competes with h.264/h.265. Yes, it makes plenty of sense. If WebM were available on iOS, this new "feature" would not exist. There would be a million 3rd party apps already doing this. Apple simply wants to lock things down purely for profit. >It's metadata-information on a picture, the main media is a regular photograph (in full quality) and the "live" part is surrounding information (in lower video-level quality) and really quite nice, it provides a loop of live context (the "live" video is 1.5s before and after) for the picture. You've just described WebM

masklinn 10y ago
> Yes, it makes plenty of sense. If WebM were available on iOS, this new "feature" would not exist. It would exist in the exact same way. Again, webm is a video codec, it competes with h.264/h.265 which is only a sub-component of a "live photo". > There would be a million 3rd party apps already doing this. There could already be a million 3rd party apps doing this using h.264. Hell there could already have been a million 3rd party apps doing this before 2015. Yet there are not. > You've just described WebM Only if you are either completely addled or thoroughly dishonest.