3 ms·
Boy you misinterpreted that one. He's saying it's dangerous as fuck to let anyone determine what is appropriate to say and what is not appropriate to say. Whe
by droopyEyelids 10y ago
Boy you misinterpreted that one.
He's saying it's dangerous as fuck to let anyone determine what is appropriate to say and what is not appropriate to say.
When you're talking about infrastructure fundamental to everyone's life determining what can be communicated you're talking about building 95% of the infrastructure of tyranny in one fell swoop.
Do you think the government or the officers of Alphabet will always be Good people that you agree with? History is rife with examples of awful people taking over once-benevolent powerful institutions.
- LeeHwang 10y agoI think it is dangerous as well. Alphabet has shown to more interested in political power than principles. From Eric directly being involved in the clinton campaign. https://qz.com/823922/eric-schmidt-played-a-crucial-role-in-team-hillarys-election-tech/ https://qz.com/823922/eric-schmidt-played-a-crucial-role-in-... http://www.googletransparencyproject.org/articles/googles-support-hillary-clinton http://www.googletransparencyproject.org/articles/googles-su... And now google donating money to Trump. http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/21/google-donated-285000-to-trumps-inauguration-despite-avid-hillary-democrat-support/ http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/21/google-donated-285000-to-t... Plus we know the amount of pressure PRISM and the other intelligence agencies can put on Silicon Valley companies.