3 ms·
Air suspension? Helicopters are aerodynes just like fixed-wing aircraft, deriving lift from aerofoil speed. They are just less efficient because in traditiona
by dingaling 10y ago
Air suspension?
Helicopters are aerodynes just like fixed-wing aircraft, deriving lift from aerofoil speed. They are just less efficient because in traditional single-rotor designs only part of the rotor disk is generating lift at any one time ( and part is stalled ) and of that part needs to be directed as propulsive thrust.
Some helicopters have employed short wings to offload the rotor.
A wingless VTOL aircraft such as the Flying Bedstead, or the Lunar Lander testbeds, is a non-aerodyne and is even less efficient because it relies on a small volume of highly-accelerated air for lift versus displacement of a large quantity of slow ( roughly speaking ).
- 11thEarlOfMar 10y agoOk, thanks for the explanation. Still wondering if electric powered flight is commercially viable for general purpose human transport.
- Gravityloss 10y agoI guess you could think of a hovering helicopter vs a circling aircraft, both having the same weight and hence same lift. Both have to accelerate some air mass downwards. The lift comes from the velocity x mass = momentum of air, which has to be the same with both. Since the airplane wings affect a larger air volume than the helicopter blades, the airplane accelerates a larger air mass, but to a lower speed. The helicopter: smaller air mass, higher speed. Since energy required is proportional to the second power of speed, the helicopter requires more power for the same lift. You could create a helicopter that was quite efficient in hover, with really big blades. It would then have some other problems, like limited speed.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> Air suspension? Could be a reference to ground effect, and a mistaken belief that helicopter lift is driven by ground effect (ground effect does play into helicopter low-altitude behavior, but as you mention they are aerodynes.)