3 ms·
I suggest reading the spec. 5.1 [0] although dated is written in very easy to understand language (well, most parts). After that, fragments like this suddenly
by hdhzy 10y ago
I suggest reading the spec. 5.1 [0] although dated is written in very easy to understand language (well, most parts).
After that, fragments like this suddenly make sense:
n = 1
/1*"\/\//.test(n + '"//')
[0]: https://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/ https://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/
- Gaelan 10y agoMy favorite bit of wat.js is this: [1,2,3] + [4,5,6] // => "1,2,34,5,6" I mean, it makes some degree of logical sense (toString -> concat) but there is no reason that would ever be the intended behavior. As for that expression, meh. You can write intentionally obtuse code in any language. The problem with JS is the behavior that is different from what you'd expect.