4 ms·
>>They optimize to reduce false positives. They're completely fine with false negatives. Getting too many false negatives is a very sure way of getting a lot o
by kamaal 10y ago
>>They optimize to reduce false positives. They're completely fine with false negatives.
Getting too many false negatives is a very sure way of getting a lot of false positives.
>>They don't have any shortage of talented engineers willing to interview there.
You might be wrong there. Apart from huge money opportunities, there are little incentives for any body to waste their best years in large company political middle levels.
- wdroz 10y ago>>Getting too many false negatives is a very sure way of getting a lot of false positives. Why ? IMO if you reduce the False Acceptance Rate, you will up the False Reject Rate. Good chart at https://www.tractica.com/biometrics/in-biometrics-which-error-rate-matters/ https://www.tractica.com/biometrics/in-biometrics-which-erro...
- rco8786 10y ago> Apart from huge money opportunities It's...amusing that you brush that off like it's nothing. Not to mention things like job security(people have families ya know?) and that having Google on your resume is still a powerful boost for future opportunities. That might not be true someday, but for now it is.