3 ms·
Very true. The problem I have with calling it a rails clone is that people expect things like scaffolding, ORM, and auto code creation. CI has scaffolding, bu
by drm237 19y ago
Very true. The problem I have with calling it a rails clone is that people expect things like scaffolding, ORM, and auto code creation. CI has scaffolding, but it's only for admin use, not production, and while there are libraries that can do the ORM and code creation, they aren't as well integrated as Rails. Still it's lightweight and fast which is why I use it.
- jdavid 19y agoi think the differences are more based on the "base" install rights of ruby, vs, the base install rights of php. many php servers do not have the option to run a cron job, and i think ruby can hold a state, where php runs the script for each request.
- drm237 19y agoAre you talking about shared hosting packages? I think judging a language or framework based on the shared hosting packages available is probably one of the less effective arguments...