4 ms·
I don't think he means the idea wouldn't have happened without him. It's his ability to disrupt an industry tightly coupled with government.
by atom-morgan 9y ago
I don't think he means the idea wouldn't have happened without him. It's his ability to disrupt an industry tightly coupled with government.
- Fricken 9y agoKalanick is a Napoleonesque figure, a great conqueror who doesn't know when to pull back on the reigns, because he knows nothing else. Our memories are short, we're skewering him for being exactly the kind of animal that not to long ago most everyone was rooting for.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- astronautjones 9y agolol
- sctb 9y agoNot here, please.
- whyenot 9y agoSo essentially he's another Brian Chesky, or Anne Wojcicki who was willing to break the rules. This is not a characteristic unique to Kalanick and I don't see why something like Uber wouldn't have come along eventually without him.