Yeah, the article feels like someone had a rambling conversation with a crypto nerd in a coffee house, ranging from how things work to recent crypto-politics, a

Yeah, the article feels like someone had a rambling conversation with a crypto nerd in a coffee house, ranging from how things work to recent crypto-politics, and then tossed off an article later. I say that because I've had those conversations myself - it is hard to explain much crypto-related without getting in to politics, because politics has shaped modern crypto. But then you've just explained a lot of dense history, politics and math in a bundle, and confused the heck out of someone. Not only because it is dense, but because far more people think they understand something about crypto than actually do. (This includes me.)