3 ms·
Of course this begs for a series of posts: clojure.py, clojure.js, clojure.pl, and clojure.arc. ;-)
by fogus 16y ago
Of course this begs for a series of posts: clojure.py, clojure.js, clojure.pl, and clojure.arc. ;-)
- steveklabnik 16y agoWithout dragging out the whole "Ruby is an acceptable Lisp" thing, I feel that your choice of Ruby was appropriate, though. With the obvious exception of Arc, I feel that Ruby is far closer to Lisp than any of those other languages. Then again, maybe it's just because I'm reading Metaprogramming Ruby right now.
- angelbob 16y agoPython offers most of the same abilities, though Pythonista culture seems to emphasize them less.
- steveklabnik 16y agoAbsolutely. The Python culture is explicitly anti-functional programming, even though the language doesn't have to be.