4 ms·
True. That was an example (not a good one) from the article. But the threat would work. Just ban a few, get the word out and people will comply. Just like drun
by losteverything 9y ago
True. That was an example (not a good one) from the article. But the threat would work. Just ban a few, get the word out and people will comply.
Just like drunk driving. Before you lost your license 1st offence, people were not as careful. Now, one drink can suspend your license with potentially dire consequences (not being able to drive to work, e.g.)
Flying is a privilege not a right.
- Zak 9y agoAirlines already do ban people, and have them dragged off planes by police when they behave badly enough (and sometimes when they want to stay in the seat they paid for). You seem to be suggesting that bad behavior on planes is prevalent enough to warrant a crackdown. I fly several times a year, and that does not match my experience. If I've stated your position correctly, why do you believe a crackdown is a good idea?
- losteverything 9y agoNo. I was referring to a verbal strategy that might work. Deny future service. Instead of arguing or physical action, one path that imo would be effective is denial of service. It isn't the act of denying the person it is the threat (real) to do so that is one a verbal arsenal. Not necessarily only for airlines but other situations in general. The goal is to change a person's action or behavior AT THAT MOMENT. By stating flat out their future service with your company is in jeopardy and it won't be tolerated IN THE FUTURE. Use the pregnant pause after stating the consequences. Then ask a few minutes later.