3 ms·
"Passengers were first offered voluntary removal incentives until, I suspect, the agent's authorized limit was reached and involuntary removal became necessary.
by sugarpile 9y ago
"Passengers were first offered voluntary removal incentives until, I suspect, the agent's authorized limit was reached and involuntary removal became necessary."
Looks like United's fault to me. On a side note, I'll never understand wanting to side with a corporation on a matter like this.
- ReligiousFlames 9y agoThis op-ed feels like confirmation bias, rationalization tribalism. Instead of offering cash-on-the-spot up to the limit for people already boarded in seats , they picked people at random and then used violence to remove anyone whom refuses to vacate said seats. They could've picked other passengers, offered cash as mentioned or rented the deadhead flightcrew a car. But no, "just following the rules/orders" leads to broken teeth, blood everywhere and dragging through aisle. I sure hope the family wins a large civil lawsuit because that seems one of the few ways to teach corporations a lesson.