3 ms·
The main point in this article seems to be that Silicon Valley companies like Uber and Theranos skirt responsibility for their actions when compared to other no
by colink 9y ago
The main point in this article seems to be that Silicon Valley companies like Uber and Theranos skirt responsibility for their actions when compared to other non-SV companies who have undergone serious disciplinary action (such as United, Wells Fargo, Fox, Volkswagon).
But the author is comparing public and private companies and stating that the main difference between the two is their zip code. This feels like apples to oranges.
I'd rather see a comparison of how ethical issues are handled between SV and non-SV privately-held companies.
- pcurve 9y ago"I'd rather see a comparison of how ethical issues are handled between SV and non-SV privately-held companies." Given complete lack of attention and interest given to the latter, I wouldn't be surprised if the situation isn't any different, if not worse. The only thing that led to actions being taken against Uber, UA, VW, Wells, is public shaming and media coverage.
- walshemj 9y agoAdding ethical lapses to media and news paper companies might be a good idea as well