> [flagged] really? i thought flagging was for spam, not for super-downvoting articles you don't agree with how many legitimate posts have been hidden from m

> [flagged] really? i thought flagging was for spam, not for super-downvoting articles you don't agree with how many legitimate posts have been hidden from me because people super-downvoted it using flagging? unless the posts are hidden manually by staff which i hope is the case