It's an interesting premise but very badly put. It starts with a bad cliche and doesn't really improve. It bags giving 'sitting' money but how is that differe

It's an interesting premise but very badly put. It starts with a bad cliche and doesn't really improve. It bags giving 'sitting' money but how is that different to just giving money directly, something that seems to improve lives. Sex workers make good money, yes, and they make even more from the aid workers. Aid workers at least bring money to the country through drinking beer and consuming local products. They do improve peoples lives. The people re-digging wells have a job. Even if it's not long term that doesn't matter and it's not really proven in the article it is not long term change.