4 ms·
It really seems like doctors could start cooperating more; specially with rare diseases.
by huherto 16y ago
It really seems like doctors could start cooperating more; specially with rare diseases.
- amichail 16y agoDo doctors always use computers as part of the diagnosis process? Shouldn't it be a criminal offense not to do this? In fact, if the diagnosis differs from what the computer says, then this should always be reported. Failure to do so should be considered a criminal offense.
- scott_s 16y agoWhat do you mean by "use computers"?
- amichail 16y agoI'm referring to using an officially mandated automated diagnosis system.
- scott_s 16y agoDoes such a thing even exist? That sounds like a very hard problem.
- ars 16y agoActually it does. It's fed with data that says: Condition X is usually caused by Y with Z% probability, etc etc. Then you feed it all the symptoms, sometimes it asks questions, and gives you a list of causes sorted by probability. It works almost exactly like this game http://www.guessthename.com/ http://www.guessthename.com/ Apparently the biggest problem with it is that doctors won't use it. The second problem is feeding data - you basically have to parse every medical paper ever published.
- riffer 16y agoWait a second, if the system does in fact exist, and it works well, and the biggest problem is that doctors won't use it, I'm with amichail.
- scott_s 16y agoGuessing a name is a much simpler problem than guessing a disease. Can you point to any such systems for medical diagnoses?
- ars 16y agoHere's a paper on one (just a random one from google) http://www.med.univ-rennes1.fr/cerf/publi/ADM_index1.html http://www.med.univ-rennes1.fr/cerf/publi/ADM_index1.html Here's a patent: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6607482.html http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6607482.html There are lots of a papers, and a small number of working prototypes, but I have not heard of any that are actually being used.
- mattmichielsen 16y agoSomething like this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oXCm4N3J_M http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oXCm4N3J_M
- CWuestefeld 16y agoDownvote. You really throw around that phrase "criminal offense" too much. Penalties are certainly a mistake in the case of your statement, as you haven't really outlined any computerized diagnostic system that is accurate on the entire range of human maladies, is available to all, and that can account for all of the fuzziness of reporting symptoms (just to name a few obstacles). But I can't see at all where you're coming from when you say criminal offense. This would suggest that doctors should be locked up?
- amichail 16y agoA doctor who refuses to use such a system is putting the lives of his patients at risk. How is that acceptable?
- pyre 16y agoBy that logic, a doctor that doesn't try every possible remedy is putting his/her patients at risk, no? So you should throw a doctor in jail for refusing to consider blood-letting as an acceptable cure?
- CWuestefeld 16y agoIt might be unacceptable (although as I said, you haven't even made that case). But that's a long way away from being criminal behavior.