4 ms·
Okay, no money was hyperbole. It makes some money. But in the large cap tech space, it's a pittance. Apple probably makes more money on sales of the iPhone 6S.
by dkrich 9y ago
Okay, no money was hyperbole. It makes some money. But in the large cap tech space, it's a pittance. Apple probably makes more money on sales of the iPhone 6S.
It's 10% of their business and yet it makes them the more money than the other 90%. What does that say about the overall business? Any other company that operated with similar fundamentals would get skewered. But because it's Amazon, they get a pass.
- robszumski 9y agoKeep in mind that they're putting up these numbers in the hosting space, which has traditionally been a "race to the bottom", low margin game. While they do cut prices, they still maintain healthy margins on the services up stack. Pretty impressive profit numbers when you take into account their hardware spend, which must be enormous.
- justicezyx 9y ago> It's 10% of their business and yet it makes them the more money than the other 90%. What does that say about the overall business? It says that Amazon successfully found themselves a cash cow. So, they have a fantastic business sense. They are smart. They executed perfectly (mind you, MSFT and Google and many other companies are doing IT and public computing service long before Amazon). I am not sure what you want to say here. Google makes most revenue and profit on Ads. But Google does all kinds of things. Does that make Google stupid? Of cuz not. Same here. I hope you ditch the thinking that everything should be the same. Diversity is not only useful in culture, it's useful in business too.
- dkrich 9y agoGoogle works on tons of different products but their only real business is the ad business and it is hugely profitable and has been so for a very long time. I have no doubt about Google's ability to make large profits because they've demonstrated that they can do so. People keep saying Amazon can make similar profits whenever they want but I see zero proof that that is true. AWS isn't a cash cow. It hasn't been proven to be a hugely profitable business yet. It makes a decent amount of money but at this point it's peanuts compared to the valuation. That said, I see a lot more long term potential in the AWS business than the ecommerce business but AWS has to grow by leaps and bounds to justify the current valuation.
- justicezyx 9y ago> AWS isn't a cash cow. Wow... I thought HN does not have people who would make such statement. Did you see the quarterly report?... That's a 14B business on a 23.5% profit margin, and still under relentless price cutting, and are gaining market everyday from traditional IT service company... > it's peanuts compared to the valuation. I dont know what to say. It's started in 2006, and now is 14B. If this says anything, this just shows how strong Amazon's business is! AWS alone is worth 100B market cap, and it's just a peanut to Amazon. I am not sure you are downplaying Amazon's success, or just trying to point out how impressive they really are. [1] http://www.businessinsider.com/amazons-q1-2016-cloud-business-2016-4 http://www.businessinsider.com/amazons-q1-2016-cloud-busines...
- dkrich 9y agoHow do you get to a 100B valuation? They are set to earn just over 2B this year. So you're willing to pay 50x earnings? Remember, this is IT, where margins should be some of the highest of any industry. Compared to software or traditional hardware companies, a 23% margin isn't very good. I actually buy into the idea that they are reinvesting in expansion which is hurting their profits, but I think it remains to be seen how profitable cloud computing actually is in the long run. It carries enormous expenses in hardware and maintenance and is becoming more competitive every day. Will AWS grow? No doubt. But by how much and at what profit level remains to be seen. If AWS was spun out as its own stock symbol separate from the ecommerce side of the house, I might even be willing to take a flier if I really felt like gambling, but at an overall valuation of $430B, it's just too expensive for me.