Well, the contract has been published, we could get more facts. (except it's midnight now and I'm not gonna read it carefully now) Without going into the extre

Well, the contract has been published, we could get more facts. (except it's midnight now and I'm not gonna read it carefully now) Without going into the extreme details of this case. Being "considerate" in legal jargon is much more subtle than "both parties have to gain something" in engineering talk. Determining the consideration can be as hard as a NP problem, to speak in engineer :D Back to my original point: Let's not talk people into signing perfectly valid contracts, hoping for a loophole because it didn't look nice enough to them!