4 ms·
Take a look at MooseFS -- it's been several years since I eval'd all these options and MooseFS was the best -- it is a very sensible system. edit - this is dis
by mattbillenstein 10y ago
Take a look at MooseFS -- it's been several years since I eval'd all these options and MooseFS was the best -- it is a very sensible system.
edit - this is distributed block storage -- if you
just need object storage, perhaps something else is in order.
- Veratyr 10y agoFrom memory MooseFS was one of the ones that lacked erasure coding. The documentation also left a lot to be desired.
- throw2016 10y agoI think Moosefs is file not block, like Gluster. I actually found it better than Gluster in terms of robustness and performance. It's got support for multiple masters, failover and a nice dashboard. One of those projects that should be much more well known than it is given there are few open source distributed storage solutions. The MFS devs are good but maybe lack the marketing savvy or perhaps just happy where they are.
- mattbillenstein 10y agoI also had a lot of issues with Gluster -- when it was broken, it was hard to know what was wrong. With MooseFS, the dashboard would usually give you a good idea, and the logs were pretty good at showing how it was replicating data after a node or disk failed.